The graph below show the percentage of men and woman aged 60 64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below show the percentage of men and woman aged 60-64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant.

The bar charts illustrate the proportion of employees in two distinct gender of four given nations a wide range from aged 60 to 64 in the year of 1970 and 2000.
Overall, there were fewer working people aged 60-64 in 2000 compared to 1970. It also clear that the rates of men taking part in workplaces were always higher than those of woman across the four given countries.
In 1970, it is noticeable that the number of male and female attending American workforce outnumbered in comparison with other territories, at 86% and 78% respectively. This was closely followed by Indonesia (84% for men and 65% for woman) and Belgium (79% for working male and 63% for working female). Working continuously senior citizen felling into the 60-64 bracket in Japan had the lowest rate among given countries.
In 2000, Belgium experienced a dramatic drop in the figures for both working male and female and then ranked the last among four nations with 52% and 8% orderly. Besides, the proportion of men in USA, Indonesia and even Japan followed a broadly similar pattern at 78%, 74% and 63% in orderly. Furthermore, regarding woman, the percentages varied between 45% and 50%.

Votes
Average: 8.2 (34 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gender' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'genders'.
Suggestion: genders
...proportion of employees in two distinct gender of four given nations a wide range from...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 86, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'clears'?
Suggestion: clears
...60-64 in 2000 compared to 1970. It also clear that the rates of men taking part in wo...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, regarding, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90909090909 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57949817516 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616161616162 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4345494805 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195788282733 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855033970376 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061531445063 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132561876648 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603576361391 0.0819641961636 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.