The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
The given table chart illustrates about the how many visitors visit to Ashdown Museum during the year before and after its was refurbished as well as pie charts show the information about the results of survey of satisfaction during the periods.
After analysing, it is clear that the maximum masses visit the museum during the year before refurbished and more people were satisfied owing to refurbished.
To begin with, the total number of visitors to Ashdown Museum. 74000 individuals visited there before refurbishment and 92000 people visited there after refurbishment.
Moreover, the first pie chart shows the survey year before refurbishment. About 30% of people were satisfied and half number of this masses were more satisfied. Dissatisfied visitors were maximum rather than others. Some people did not response that was 5% and the double of this, masses were very dissatisfied.
Furthermore, year after refurbishment, survey shows the maximum number of people were satisfied (40%) as well as 35% people were more satisfied. Whereas, 15% masses were dissatisfied. And the very dissatisfied and no responded individuals were same value, that was 5%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'how'?
Suggestion: how
...The given table chart illustrates about the how many visitors visit to Ashdown Museum d...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: thereafter
... refurbishment and 92000 people visited there after refurbishment. Moreover, the first pi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 129, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...eople were satisfied and half number of this masses were more satisfied. Dissatisfie...
^^^^
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...well as 35% people were more satisfied. Whereas, 15% masses were dissatisfied. And the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, moreover, so, well, whereas, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40331491713 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87459577611 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486187845304 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.0182968929 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.9090909091 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4545454545 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.468103205324 0.215688989381 217% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176513645442 0.103423049105 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119117211313 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286762984627 0.15604864568 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0915531066498 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.