The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods
The chart illustrates how many people visit Ashdown Museum in two periods of time, before and after its redecoration, as well as demonstrating the result of questionnaires on the satisfaction level of visitors.
Overall, It could be seen easily that after the refurbishment the number of people coming to Ashdown Museum increased, accompanied by the positive trend in the level of satisfaction.
Having a closer look at the table, during the year before refurbishment, 74,000 visitors chose the Ashdown Museum as their destination. In the second period of the survey, the figure grew into 92,000.
Furthermore, a massive 40% of visitors felt dissatisfied before the redecoration, followed by only under one-third of them satisfied. However, after the refurbishment, the rate of visitors feeling satisfied increased by 10%, therefore accounting for the biggest part of the pie, while the figure for dissatisfied declined sharply to only 15%. In the same period, the number of visitors feeling very satisfied grew significantly by 20%, whereas the statistic for very dissatisfied decreased by half. The data on no response remains unchanged, at only 5%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, look, second, therefore, third, well, whereas, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42777777778 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19248248929 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5696353686 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.125 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 5.23603664747 215% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308180474822 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110976040318 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765025147394 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16826082686 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542564272726 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.