The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. Summ

The given table represents the yearly visitors to Ashdown Museum before and after its renovation, while the pie charts show the survey results about the satisfaction levels of the same tourists.
Overall, it is clear that the number of museum visitors increased considerably after the refurbishment and the satisfaction rates also increased to a greater level.
Moving on to the details, the annual figure of visitors in the pre refurbishment year was 74000, showed a growth to 92000 after the renovation work. Among those 74000, a half of people expressed not satisfied with their experience in the museum. 40% said they were dissatisfied while 10% very disappointed. However, after the works those numbers reduced to a fifth, and a third quarter of post renovation visitors experienced more satisfied in the museum. While, 40% reported satisfied another 35% commented as very satisfied. Also the percentage of dissatisfied people reduced to a fifth in the second year. Meanwhile, an equal number of visitors ( 5%) in both the period refused to express their opinion on satisfaction survey.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in the pre refurbishment year was 74000, showed a growth to 92000 after the renov...
^^
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the renovation work. Among those 74000, a half of people expressed not satisfied...
^^
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0% said they were dissatisfied while 10% very disappointed. However, after the wo...
^^
Line 3, column 510, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reported satisfied another 35% commented as very satisfied. Also the percentage o...
^^
Line 3, column 531, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...other 35% commented as very satisfied. Also the percentage of dissatisfied people r...
^^^^
Line 3, column 651, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Meanwhile, an equal number of visitors 5% in both the period refused to express...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, third, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27011494253 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91682945019 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603448275862 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.4255429186 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.888888889 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35734503791 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129458004494 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0900186695273 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236896756517 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0987533497415 0.0819641961636 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.