The presented statistical table compares two genders and five age segments in terms of their proportion getting involved in cycling in a particular area in 2011.
Overall, it is evident that bicycles were used by both gender and all age sections in this town. Moreover, it is witnessed that the number of women riding a bicycle was higher than that of men in all age groups in 2011.
Turning into detail, female and male who are under 9 shared the similar numbers of members taking part in riding bikes, which accounted for 51,3 % and 50,3%, respectively. In 10-24 sector, while the percentage of female bicyclists occupied over 42% of women, the figure of male was 2-time lower than that of baby boy group. In 25-39 category, approximately 17% of female rode bicycles, followed by a nearly-ten-percent number of male.
Regarding to older groups, in 40-59 group, the rate of people who were involved in cycling was lowest among 5 conveyed age groups. Particularly, the proportion of women accounted for more than 12%, whereas, that of men only occupied exactly 8%.Turning into the elderly group, the percentage of bicyclist in female and male gender reached above 13%, specifically, 18,5% and 13,2%, perspectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ccupied over 42% of women, the figure of male was 2-time lower than that of baby ...
^^
Line 7, column 245, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Turning
...s, that of men only occupied exactly 8%.Turning into the elderly group, the percentage ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1024.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09452736318 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84413588123 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621890547264 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7748334185 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145097934975 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658021920203 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.034362281129 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.091162916671 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364972844586 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.