The table represents the percentages of personal savings in personal income in the years 1970, 1990, and 2000.
Overall, out of seven countries only the UK experienced increasing trend of personal savings from the beginning to the end of the period, where almost all the remaining others witnessed the opposite pattern.
In the year 1970, Italy was the country that lead the proportion of personal savings with 29.5% followed by France and Japan with 18.7% and 17.6% respectively. Canada gathered 5.6% of personal savings which was the lowest score in 1970. Although remaining in the same position to the year 1970, Italy experienced a decreased amount of personal savings to 17.6% in the year 1990. In the same year Canada scored almost double amount of personal savings and reached to 11.5% while Germany experienced a constant amount of personal savings with 13.8% after 20 year period.
In 2000, France and Japan jointly lead the proportion of personal savings with the same figure of 13.6%. USA on the other hand, continued to decline and reached to 4.0% of personal savings in the year 2000. Besides Canada got a significant drop of personal savings and reached to 1.9% and made the lowest score in the year 2000.
- The table below shows personal savings as a percentage of personal income for selected countries in 1970, 1990 and 2000. 67
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 61
- Every year several languages die out Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- The table below shows the result of a survey in which people of different age group were asked about their favorite TV program Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1024.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99512195122 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47344492635 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458536585366 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9953324654 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.777777778 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393635144124 0.215688989381 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.220776860866 0.103423049105 213% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143838137253 0.0843802449381 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.314014007579 0.15604864568 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.186558007385 0.0819641961636 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.