The table below shows the production of potatoes cabbage and onions in five countries in 2012

Essay topics:

The table below shows the production of potatoes, cabbage and onions in five countries in 2012

The tabular chart depicts the information about the manufacturing of three different types of vegetables such as potatoes, cabbage and onions terms of millions of tonnes oby five countries (ireland,Spain,china, Russian and brazil) in 2012 year.
After analysing the table, it can be seen clearly that china produced 9214 mt of potatoes in 2012,whereas Ireland country remained at second position grew only 72 mt. In contrast, negligible difference was seen in production of potato in Brazil and spain in
and spain (3 mt and 2mt) in same year. The production of Russian bring up 30 mt of potatoes. The production of cabbage was 3187 mt and 2765 mt in China and Russia respectively in 2012, while in Ireland was manufacturing just one's fourth of the total production. In Spain, 200 mt produced cabbage, however Brazil was not involved in the production of same vegetable.
The table further collates that there was a difference of approximately 6 mt in the production of onions in China and Russia, Spain was not in the manufacturing of the onions. Whist, the production of onions was 1417 mt and 4 mt in Brazil and Ireland correspondingly in 2012.
Overall, maximum production were seen in three vegetables in China instead of other countries, while minimum production of Spain and Brazil in cabbage and onions.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (9 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Spain
...ons of tonnes oby five countries ireland,Spain,china, Russian and brazil in 2012 year....
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...duction of potato in Brazil and spain in and spain 3 mt and 2mt in same year. Th...
^^^
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in Brazil and spain in and spain 3 mt and 2mt in same year. The production of ...
^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e minimum production of Spain and Brazil in cabbage and onions.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, whereas, while, in contrast, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1094.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01834862385 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12134307535 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495412844037 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8202019808 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.555555556 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238023943569 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111890470743 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403962561687 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146695697268 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323994494553 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.