The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.
The table provides sufficient information about the percent and the number of six various groups of Australian families who were living in poverty in the year 1999. Overall, as it can be seen there was 11 percent about 1.8 million people were living in poverty and the maximum proportion was for sale parent by a little more than 20%.
As is given in the table, the minimum proportions of households ,who where living in the poverty, were for aged couple and single aged couple by 4%(just under 50000) and 6% (just over 54000) respectively. On the other hand, there was the largest number that assigned to sole parent by just over one-fifth equal to almost 230000 families. This is noticable that, the other shares were single people without any children by 19%(around 350000), couple-no children by exactly 7%(almost 200000), and couple with at least one children by 12%(roughly 900000) in Australia, in the year 1999.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 64, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e, the minimum proportions of households ,who where living in the poverty, were fo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, as for, at least, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 756.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87741935484 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43648985846 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632258064516 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.2182274552 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.2 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16388313583 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866176200325 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740603365333 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136681531018 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715255541593 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.62 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.