The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.
The provided table reveals information about poverty rates in australian families in 1999. Families are categorized as into three subgroups: single aged people and aged couple, single and couples without children, sole parent and couples with children.
According to the table, among all families the highest level of poverty belonged to families with sole parent, which is 21%, whereas poverty rate for a couple with children was only 12%. When it comes to people without children, poverty level among single people is much higher (19%) in comparison to couples (7%). In contrast, lowest level of poverty can be seen among elderly, to be precise, it is 6% for single aged person and 4% for aged couple. Similar pattern is observed across all subgroups: couples tend to have lower poverty rate in contrast to single people.
To conclude, highest proportion of poor people is sole parent, while lowest rate of poverty is observed among aged people. Overall, 11% of all Australians from all household were considered to be poor.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the lowest'.
Suggestion: , the lowest
...in comparison to couples 7%. In contrast, lowest level of poverty can be seen among elde...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 12, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the highest'.
Suggestion: , the highest
...ntrast to single people. To conclude, highest proportion of poor people is sole paren...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 64, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'while the lowest'.
Suggestion: while the lowest
...oportion of poor people is sole parent, while lowest rate of poverty is observed among aged ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, whereas, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.125 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46643424856 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7106156316 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.625 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134717945125 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735585961166 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714972084939 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100078130671 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334468557897 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.