The table below shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary
school types between 2000 and 2009.
The graph depicts how many students attend secondary school, divided into four categories, from 2000 to 2009.
Overall, It was immediately apparent that the figure for community school experienced an upward trend. Whereas that other category saw a reserved trend.
Moving to a more detailed analysis, in 2009, the percentage of students who attended community school increase by more than a half, inclining to 58% from 12%. By contrast, other schools such as specialist schools, grammar school, and voluntary-controlled school showed a downward trend in 2009. While the former fell from 52% to 20%, the two latters reduced to under 13%, with 12%, 10% each.
On the other hand, there was a greater proportion of community and voluntary school in 2009, with 58%, and 20% respectively, which the figure for community school was a maximum recorded. Standing in contrast, fewer students attend grammar at roughly 12%. Moreover, it appeared that only 10% of students went to special school in 2009, a much lower than other schools.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 103, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ity school experienced an upward trend. Whereas that other category saw a reserved tren...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, second, whereas, while, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 865.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21084337349 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80770072047 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626506024096 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.1054166472 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1111111111 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118820314074 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516906835177 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521807206402 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0841786710609 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628435203049 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.