The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university.
The table data below compares the findings of a survey based on various aspects in one university in three separate years; 2000, 2005 and 2010.
A glance at the figure reveals that electronic resources received the progressive feedback than other counterparts.
According to the survey it is the printing resources who holds the first position throughout the period, starting from 84 numbers of respondent who have supported this in 2000 to 88 in 2010, after decreasing slightly with the figure of 2005 in the question. Moreover, among the available facilities in the university the range of modules offered followed a decreasing patter throughout the period whereas electronic resources showed an upward trend, though the level of appreciation from student was marginal. Lastly, it is interesting to note that teaching quality have fluctuate opinion up to 2005 but increased slightly over the decade while the respondents view regarding the teaching facilities remained the same at about 77 percent over the period of time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 572, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'fluctuated'.
Suggestion: fluctuated
...ting to note that teaching quality have fluctuate opinion up to 2005 but increased slight...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 748, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...d the same at about 77 percent over the period of time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, lastly, moreover, regarding, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 870.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37037037037 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81852825228 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654320987654 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.5844136125 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 174.0 112.824112599 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.4 22.9334400587 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8 5.23603664747 225% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223658775407 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112518572075 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126001627871 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156489058428 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145576547124 0.0819641961636 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 13.2329268293 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 61.2550243902 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.46 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.06136585366 125% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.