The table below shows statistics about the top five countries for international tourism in 2012 and 2013

Essay topics:

The table below shows statistics about the top five countries for international tourism in 2012 and 2013

The table compares five highest ranking countries in terms of worldwide tourist number and expenditure in 2012 and 2013.
As can be seen, the two-year period witnessed an upward trend in both aspects of tourism in all countries except for China. While the largest number of tourists was seen for France, USA was the dominant nation in tourist revenue.
We can see that France was the most popular tourist destination internationally, experiencing a slight rise to 84,7 millions visitors in 2013. Despite increasing number of travelers, the revenue this country earned from tourism was only half as much as the figure from USA, which was averagely 55 billion dollars compared to 130 billion dollars. Although there were fewer visitors to the US, this country was in the first rank regarding the gross revenue from tourism.
Spain was the only nation experiencing the highest growth rate in tourist number and spending, increasing by 3,1 millions people and 4 billion dollars respectively. Italy also saw a small rise in both aspects, but it still was the least chosen destination of 5 countries. In contrast to other nations, China’s number of tourists fell slightly to 55,7 million people, but its revenue went up to 51,7 billion dollars overall.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... upward trend in both aspects of tourism in all countries except for China. While...
^^
Line 4, column 424, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent up to 51,7 billion dollars overall.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, regarding, so, still, while, except for, in contrast, in contrast to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1049.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11707317073 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66389703484 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614634146341 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6277314207 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.555555556 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.55555555556 5.23603664747 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125302943478 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610638140816 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726491941475 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104874701206 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0865519877183 0.0819641961636 106% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.