The table below shows the water usage for different purposes in six different countries in 2001. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The table given here shows the amount of water used for three different purposes in six different nations in 2001. Overall, agriculture sector used huge amounts of water compared to other two industries in all the six countries.

In agriculture, Russia and Turkey used 1663 m3 and 1462 m3, which is the highest amount of water used on comparison with other nations. Canada ranked third with a utilisation of 1238 m3 of water, while the other three nations utilised water in farming to a lower extent with 810 m3 by Uk and the least usage of 605 m3 by China.

For domestic usage, Australia ranked first with 341m3 of utilisation followed by Canada with 279m3 of water usage. Russia and Turkey have used 98m3 and 80m3 of water for house hold work. The countries with the least utilisation of water for domestic purpose are UK and China, with 38m3 and 26m3 of water utilisation.

In industrial sector, Turkey topped the chart with 731m3 of water usage, followed by 532m3 of usage by China. UK and Russia which have utilised 398 and 275m3 of water, while China and Russia utilised only 71 and 96m3 of water.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...other nations. Canada ranked third with a utilisation of 1238 m3 of water, while ...
^
Line 5, column 57, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ge, Australia ranked first with 341m3 of utilisation followed by Canada with 279m...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, third, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71794871795 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33873142842 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497435897436 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7698994553 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.222222222 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187809760156 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999494081578 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102438289811 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132346410724 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0861077371952 0.0819641961636 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.