The table elucidates the changes of global market shares of notebook computer companies for two consecutive years, 2006 and 2007.
In both years it is discernible that, hp was distinctively the leader of Notebook computer markets, selling 31% in 2006, slightly more (34%) in 2007. This is the greater share than its closest two competitors, dell and Acer added together. Dell increased its market share at 20.02% from 16.6% in two years. In contrast, Acer saw its market share declined at 10.7% in 2007 from 11.6% in 2007. The other listed companies had a smaller portion of market share of the total. Toshiba grew its share from 2006 to 2007, which were 6.2% to 7.3% respectively, whereas Toshiba’s closest competitor felt at 6.2% in 2007 from 6.6% in 2006. Similarly, Fujitsu-Siemens lost halve of its market share (2.3%) in 2007 from 4.8% in 2006.
The other notebook manufactures accounted for 22.8% of the market share in 2006- more than all the companies mentioned except HP. However, in 2007 the companies only made 19.3% of notebook computer sales-less then both hp and dell.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 632, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...felt at 6.2% in 2007 from 6.6% in 2006. Similarly Fujitsu-Siemens lost halve of its marke...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, similarly, then, whereas, as to, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 798.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92592592593 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68688040713 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586419753086 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 209.7 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.140462345 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6666666667 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368807947267 0.215688989381 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162328679498 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696960409977 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293066549686 0.15604864568 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0114157136173 0.0819641961636 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.