The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne.
The table graph illustrates five different types of junk food eaten in Melbourne in 2005, 2019 and 2025 is predicted.
Overall, while the hamburgers play the major role in the eating habits of people, fried rice and noodles preferred the least in Melbourne.
In 2005, 40 units of hamburgers were eaten by people and this year it experienced a slight decrease to 38 units. However, it is predicted that in 2025, 51 units of hamburgers going to be consumed by people. Fried chicken was the second preferred fast food in the table starting from 35 units and expected to be 51 units in 2025.
Turning to the least chosen fast foods, in 2005 only 5 units of salads were eaten. However, this year, number of units eaten reached to 15 and according to the table a dramatic increase is expected in 2025 reaching to 41 units. In contrast, in 2005 only 6 units of fried rice and noodles were eaten and small increases are expected reaching to 9 units for both kinds of food.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 29, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to fast'
Suggestion: to fast
...in 2025. Turning to the least chosen fast foods, in 2005 only 5 units of salads w...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 806.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63218390805 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42278020436 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540229885057 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.9985794996 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.75 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119637877982 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583198781523 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377828685816 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0766703733908 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234091819742 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.