The stipulated tabular chart elucidates information about the consumption of fast foods such as hamburgers, fried chicken, salad, fried rice and Noodles in Melbourne in year 2005 and the present year as well as some predictions about 2025.
Overall, the key points to all that hamburgers and fried chicken always on the hit list of the consumers while people like fried rice and Noodles least whether in past, present and future.
Apropos to the detail of the graph, that people ate 40 units of hamburgers in 2005 while reduction of two units recorded in the present year. Interestingly, it would rise dramatically by 11 units in 2025 than past. Probing further, similar trend imitated by fried chicken. Moreover, consumption of it was 35 units in 2005 where it upsurged by 2 units in current year and would be inclined by 10 units in future.
Moving to the more precise detail of the chart, that people did not like to have salad in their diet in 2005. Therefore, they consume only 5 units whereas is it reaches to 15 units in present as well as would reach to 41 units in 2025. Apart from this, consumption of fried rice and Noodles was identical 6 units in 2005 and same in future 9 units in 2025. Subsequently, this data differs only in the present by 1 unit, 9 units of fried rice and 8 units of noodles.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put before the verb 'chicken'.
Suggestion: always chicken
...points to all that hamburgers and fried chicken always on the hit list of the consumers while ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...ke fried rice and Noodles least whether in past, present and future. Apropos to the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to the detail of the graph, that people ate 40 units of hamburgers in 2005 while...
^^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... year and would be inclined by 10 units in future. Moving to the more precise detail o...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, apart from, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1074.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58974358974 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52352508007 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525641025641 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5160798087 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.4 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0425165534466 0.215688989381 20% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0202871147677 0.103423049105 20% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0265992007859 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0333489805405 0.15604864568 21% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018883354804 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.