The given table depicts, the average amount of junk foods consumed by different people divided into 5 categories (Hamburgers, Fried Chicken, Salads, Fried Rice and Noodles) who lives in Melbourne. It’s between the year of 2005 - 2025. The units are measured in numbers.
Overall, Hamburgers leads top in the table and predicted to be the most consumed junk food by the year 2025 with increment, followed by Fried Chicken which is the second most consumed junk food also having an increment. Salads top third in the list. Fried rice, Noodles are least consumed food.
Hamburgers and Fried Chicken are the most popular junk food among all years as compared to Salads, Fried Rice, Noodles. Hamburgers remain perennial favourite as 40 units in 2005, slightly lower for the time being but it is prognosticated that there will be a gradual upsurge in its popularity and reaches 51 units by the year 2025. Fried Chicken consumption is increasing at a leisurely pace from 35 to 45
Fried Rice and Noodles starting low, making marginal gains and never soar above 10. And forecasted to rise up to 9 units in 2025. In contrast, salads were the least ate in 2005(5 units), but after ages, it leapt up to 15 units. It is prophesied that salads will have a lofty increase in 2025 by 41 units
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...perennial favourite as 40 units in 2005, slightly lower for the time being but it...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, third, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77027027027 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50090775613 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59009009009 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 69.8062795647 43.030603864 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.25 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0928512015722 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0329455066064 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481818930004 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0657493106188 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501434979945 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.