The table illustrates how much money donated to support technology, by the US, EU, and other countries charities, in billions of US dollars between 2006 and 2010.
The table illustrates how much money donated to support technology, by the US, EU, and other countries charities, in billions of US dollars between 2006 and 2010.
Overall, total aid increased rapidly in 5 years, and the US charities gave most of the money for donations.
From 2006 to 2010, the number of total aid rose significantly from $15,7 billion to $30 billion, raising $14,3 billion in the periods. During this time, US charities contribute grew steadily from $9.7 billion to reach a peak of $22.7 billion. Besides, the donation of remain charities also increased in the time.
In EU countries, there was a slowly grow in money aid each year from $3.3 billion (2006) to $3.8 billion (2008), followed by a slight fall in next year, before reaching to $4.0 billion in 2010. Moreover, contribution in other countries also rose although this figure had similar fluctuation as the number of EU charities in the amount of money given each year. Their donation went up from $2.7 billion to $3.3 billion at the end of the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...charities also increased in the time. In EU countries, there was a slowly grow...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74011299435 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61999520235 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576271186441 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6453023699 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.875 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.477807247054 0.215688989381 222% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.225576232604 0.103423049105 218% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.294595738448 0.0843802449381 349% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.370879679683 0.15604864568 238% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.365234537115 0.0819641961636 446% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.