The table illustrates the proportion of monthly household income five European countries spend on food and drink, housing, clothing and entertainme
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table given describes the percentage of expenditure that five different countries in Europe such as France, Germany, the UK, Spain and Turkey pay for eatables and drinkables, lodging, dressing and entertaining.
It is obvious that food and house are the top priorities among the rest. Clothing and entertainment obviously take a humble proportion on expending.
First of all, it is likely that France uses most of its money for homes with 31%. Similarly, Germany and the UK share a common interest in spending money with France when they spend 33% and 37% respectively on shelter. Unlike the others, Turkey and Spain are seemly pay a large amount of their budget for eating and drinking.
Turning to costume and pleasure, despite the fact that the French are well-known as the most fashionable people in the world, 7% is the percentage that french spend for clothes. The Germans and The Spanish are also expend least on dressing with 15% and 8% in turn. Oppositely, the Turkish pay fewest for their amusements with only 10%. Finally, it is the British who possess a similar proportion of 11% in both dressing and entertaining.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'expended'.
Suggestion: expended
...s. The Germans and The Spanish are also expend least on dressing with 15% and 8% in tu...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'expend the least'.
Suggestion: expend the least
...s. The Germans and The Spanish are also expend least on dressing with 15% and 8% in turn. Op...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, similarly, so, well, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98421052632 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71762483881 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605263157895 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.6171642209 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0807934261336 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0306415454398 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299754794175 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0531572783198 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246249847833 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.