The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for a period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Submitted by nazanink1 on Sat, 01/19/2019 - 09:51

The table gives data about sales cellphones of 5 reputable cellphone companies including Samsung, Nokia, Ericson, Motorola and Apple over a period of 6 years from 2006 until 2012.
A striking feature of the table is that both Samsung and apple enjoyed a significant rise in their sales from 117 sets in 2006 and 2.3 sets in 2007 to 396.5 million and 135.8 million in 2012 respectively. As can be seen from table Samsung’s numbers were much greater than Apples numbers over the period given. The most notable feature was that Nokia maintained its popularity to the most throughout of the period with its peak in 2008 when 475 million mobile phones were sold out. Finally, Nokia secured second highest position with 335 millions of sets in 2012.From the table it is clear Ericsson’s sales decreasing steeply from 95 million in 2008 to 28 million in 2012 after souring from 74 million in 2006 to 102 million in 2007. Motorola was second biggest producer of cell phones in 2006 with sells of 210 million of mobiles, however, in next years experienced significant dropped in sales to 28 million in 2012, same as Ericsson.
Wholly, Samsung finishing whit the highest level of sales. also, Motorola and Ericsson cellphone rate fluctuated throughout the period, but both suffered the lowest number of sales overall, achieving only 28 million sales each in 2012.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 539, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '335 million'.
Suggestion: 335 million
...ia secured second highest position with 335 millions of sets in 2012.From the table it is clear...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 568, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: From
...ition with 335 millions of sets in 2012.From the table it is clear Ericsson's s...
^^^^
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...ishing whit the highest level of sales. also, Motorola and Ericsson cellphone rate f...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, second, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1139.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97379912664 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58933922801 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563318777293 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.9577694437 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.375 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.625 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152603503283 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734265162165 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359975370222 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0906640369461 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498365211243 0.0819641961636 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.