The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobilephone market for manufactures in the years 2005 and 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant .

The table illustrates the percentage of market share owned by major cell phone manufactures, which were Nokia, Motorola, Samsung, Sony Ericsson, LG, BenQ Mobile and others, in the year of 2005 and 2006.

Overall, Nokia dominated the internation mobile phone market in 2005 and its market share expanded in 2006.

The performance of Nokia was outstanding in 2005 with a dominant 32.5% of total worldwide market. Besides, saling in 2006 was also promising with 2.5% increase in international mobile phone market share. Motorola was the second large cell phone manufacture in 2005 with 17.7% of universal market share. In addition, market share of Motorola increased dramatically to 21.1% in the following year.

Samsung ranked the third position in globke market share with 12.7% in 2005. However, unlike Nokia and Motarola, its market share dropped slightly to 11.8% in 2006. Sinilarily, BenQ Mobile lost its international market share from 4.9% in 2005 to 2.4% in 2006. Other companies did not vary much in the precentage of market share.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...rldwide market. Besides, saling in 2006 was also promising with 2.5% increase in international mob...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, second, so, third, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2754491018 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65487670622 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550898203593 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0605191063 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315812618684 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161106164681 0.103423049105 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0295411658983 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224120409433 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295736039825 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.