The table charts illustrate information about two surveys in different aspects of life among urban residents from 1980 to 2010.
Overall, it is a readily apparent that, fields such as, shops, healthcare, transport system and accommodation were received more positive judgements in 2010 as compared to year 1980.
To begin with, in 1980, while education had 82 positive judgements, shops and environment like aspects accounted for only 75 to 72. In the same year, people gave 64 good feedbacks for healthcare and there were 24 medium judgements given by residents in the same field. Moreover, transport system received 14 bad feedbacks, however there were only 10 feedback for accommodation field.
In addition, during 2010, there was decrease in number of the positive feedbacks about education, while count of positive judgements increased for shops and healthcare (81 and 63). Similarly, transport system and accommodation also witnessed high rise in number of positive feedbacks by following year. Finally, it is clearly seen that, medium judgements had decreased sharply for all aspects in 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... feedbacks for healthcare and there were 24 medium judgements given by residents ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, while, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47368421053 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86658291874 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625730994152 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.7037903544 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.875 5.23603664747 227% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0895017175709 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485728874054 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818731747248 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0841402099939 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102300887943 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.