The tables below give information about fossil fuel and electricity use in two different countries.
The tables illustrate the percentage of total energy by fossil fuel and total electricity consumption by every person each year in Sweden and United Kingdom in 2013 and 2015. Overall, the use of fossil fuel and electricity seemed to cut by two countries.
Now turning to the detail, in 2013, the highest percentage of fossil fuel used by UK, which accounted for 88% of total energy, Whereas Sweden was far lower at 34%. In 2015, the total energy consumption of United Kingdom decreased slightly by 3%, similarly, Sweden stagnated to 31%.
In 2013, a higher amount of electricity made use of every citizen in Sweden, which was calculated 14934 kWh per year, then, in 2013, the consumption dropped significantly to 14290 kWh. On the other hand, the electricity use by per UK people was 3 times lower than Sweden, showed 5707 kWh per year. After that, the individual of UK started to use less energy in their daily life; in 2015, it collapsed at 5452 kWh per year. In contrary, Sweden and United Kingdom had considerable difference in the use of total energy by fossil fuel and the use of electricity per year.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, then, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77720207254 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6290422982 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502590673575 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.1894517369 43.030603864 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.714285714 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5714285714 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2320047033 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147953896168 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133051244302 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185256028178 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104753109722 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.