The tables below give information about fossil fuel and electricity use in two different countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two tables describe fossil fuel usage, which expressed in a percentage of total energy, and electricity consumption per person in kWh/year for two countries, Sweden and the United Kingdom. The statistics are provided for two years, 2013 and 2015.
Overall, there was a decrease in consumption of both resources in the given time interval for the countries listed. Comparing the countries, fossil fuel was a significant portion of all the energy resources used in the UK, while in Sweden this parameter comprised only one-third of total energy. The opposite trend can be observed in electricity consumption: in Sweden people utilised almost three times more energy (close to 15000 kWh in Sweden and only about 5500 kWh in the UK).
Both in Sweden and in the UK fossil fuel usage declined by 3%, from 34 to 31 per cent in Sweden and from 88 to 85 per cent in the UK, as time progressed.
At the same time, an individual in Sweden consumed electricity equal to 14934 kWh in 2013, while in 2015 this value dropped by approximately 600 kWh. Similarly, the person living in the UK used less electricity in 2015 than in 2013, however, the amount of decrease was smaller, merely 250 kWh (from 5701 to 5452 kWh).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: AS_TIME_PROGRESSED[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as time passed'?
Suggestion: as time passed
...n and from 88 to 85 per cent in the UK, as time progressed. At the same time, an individual in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, similarly, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78571428571 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65869983399 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.523285219 43.030603864 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.571428571 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110969694997 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579889829992 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364656537829 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0731530763517 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391582602842 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.