The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Two tables illustrate information about the amounts of money paid by 5 countries for coffee and bananas in the years 1999 and 2004.
The first table shows that Switzerland had the highest amount of spending money for coffee among other countries in 1999. Furthermore, Denmark and the UK were the countries grasping second and third places in terms of paying for coffee respectively, and Belgium with Sweden by marginal differences paid 1 millions of euros and 0.8 millions of euros for coffee. In contrast with the second column in first table, UK by far paid the maximum amount of money (20 millions of euros) in 2004 for coffee that this amount is 3.3 times more than the year 1999. Also, Switzerland doubled the money paid for coffee while other countries Have not a significant increase.
The second table shows that paying for bananas has soared in Switzerland, the UK and Belgium in 2004 in contrast with 1999, and it is approximately tripled in Switzerland, quintupled in the UK and is 2.5-fold in Belgium. Sweden and Denmark have diminished their expenses for paying for bananas in 2004 in comparison with 1999.
To sum up, by comparing sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999, except the Switzerland that has increased its money spending for bananas 5-folds more than coffee, other countries have a small amount of fluctuations in their statistics. Furthermore, in the year 2004, Switzerland and the UK spent comparable money for bananas than coffee, and other countries have small amount increasing and decreasing trends.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '1 million'.
Suggestion: 1 million
...ith Sweden by marginal differences paid 1 millions of euros and 0.8 millions of euros for cof...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '8 million'.
Suggestion: 8 million
...ferences paid 1 millions of euros and 0.8 millions of euros for coffee. In contrast with the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...nd 0.8 millions of euros for coffee. In contrast with the second column in first table, ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '20 million'.
Suggestion: 20 million
...by far paid the maximum amount of money 20 millions of euros in 2004 for coffee that this amou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, second, so, third, while, in contrast, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1299.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 255.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09411764706 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8224834664 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.43137254902 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 361.8 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.0164583972 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.333333333 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185984412989 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109121580323 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748694993316 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160706725231 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0792844332536 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.