The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries

The information about the sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five different nations is depicted by the rendered two tables. The data has been calibrated in millions of euros.

To begin with, in 1999, 1.5 and 3 millions euros sales of coffee were in the UK and Switzerland. However, there had been drastic increase noticed in 2004 for these countries, it was increased by 18.5 and 3 correspondingly. Moreover, in Denmark and Sweden, there were 0.2 million euros of the positive difference between1999 and 2004. 1 million euros sales of coffee were in Belgium, in 1999. After 5 years, it was increased by 0.7.

Moving towards, a dramatic increase was seen in the sale of bananas in Switzerland in 2004, it comprised to 47 millions of euros. Sweden and Denmark is the only country where the sales of banana were decreased, which were decreased by 0.8 and 0.1 respectively. Whereas, there was a rapid increase observed in the sales of bananas in the UK and Belgium, which were 5.5 and 4 in 2004 respectively.

To sum up, it can be vividly manifested that the sales of coffee were increased in all five European countries throughout the span.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '47 million'.
Suggestion: 47 million
...in Switzerland in 2004, it comprised to 47 millions of euros. Sweden and Denmark is the only c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, whereas, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83663366337 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94081490653 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519801980198 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0890819514 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318653616812 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139366429394 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127858873012 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223353000405 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103261945791 0.0819641961636 126% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.