The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Submitted by S.Mohsen on Wed, 02/27/2019 - 12:09

The pie charts indicate the percentage of changes on spending in a school in the UK in the year 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Overall, it can be seen that the largest proportion of spending in each year went on teachers' salaries. However, insurance has the lowest percentages in this school.
The school spending on teachers' salaries was dramatically highest in 1981, 1991 and also 2001, at 40%, 50% and 45% respectively. Whereas spending on insurance was the lowest with an increasing trend to just 8% in the year 2001.
The figure for resources such as books was 15% in 1981, and it increased significantly to 20% in 1991. While it dropped to just under 10% in 2001. In addition, the percentage of furniture and equipment fluctuated between 5% and 23%, which that of was 13% in 1981. Other workers' salaries showed a downward trend throughout the period given from 28% in 1981 to 15% in 2001.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...2001, at 40%, 50% and 45% respectively. Whereas spending on insurance was the lowest wi...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 103, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...increased significantly to 20% in 1991. While it dropped to just under 10% in 2001. I...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, whereas, while, in addition, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 733.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69871794872 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69495443773 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 192.6 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.9420055956 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.4444444444 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228413917648 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991946608933 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103351470298 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169578399741 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122950402809 0.0819641961636 150% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 88.06 61.2550243902 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.