The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The pie charts demonstrate the expenditure deference of a uk school through three decades from 1981 to 2001.

In general, the largest and smallest were in teachers' salaries and the insurance respectively while the rest parts had significantly converted in 1981, 1991 and 2001.

In 1981 and 1991, the other workers' salaries and insurance had just small changes about 6% and 1% in the order. On the other hand, the expenditure for resource e.g books and furniture and equipment got the same percentage that is 15%. In period 1981 to 1991, teachers' salaries rose from 40% to 50% and dropped to 45% in 2001.

From 1981 to 2001, the money was spent on insurance that had increased more 5% which was the same as expenditure of resource e.g books between 1981 and 1991. Then, in 2001, spending for books declined about 11% that is opposite for furniture and equipment which had its percentage approximately four times rise after 10 years. The proportion of other workers' salaries in this time was decreased from 20% to 15% while insurance rose 5%.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The pie charts demonstrate the expenditure deference of...
^^
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...emonstrate the expenditure deference of a uk school through three decades from 19...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while, in general, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86592178771 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6029203373 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536312849162 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.303875618 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.875 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162466290695 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837604140241 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074951724914 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128145655317 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729204259112 0.0819641961636 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.