The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The given infographics provide information on expenditure of a UK school for the years 1981, 1991, and 2001.
As can be seen, most expenditure purposes, such as teachers’ salaries, educational resources and school facilities, undulated, whereas the other purposes showed either constant increase or decrease for the given period.
Teachers’ salaries, constituted the most proportion of spending in all provided years, was at forty per cent in 1981, then this figure increased significantly to the half of all spending for the year 1991; nevertheless, it decreased by five per cent and consisted forty five per cent of all spending in 2001. The school allocated fifteen per cent of its spending for such educational resources as books in 1981. This figure reached its maximum value at twenty per cent in 1991 before slumping to only nine per cent in 2001. Similarly the school’s expenditure on school facilities fluctuated substantially; initially, in 1981, the facilities constituted fifteen per cent of the spending, then the school cut off the allocation three times resulting in only five per cent was spent on the facilities in 1991. However, there was an increase in expenditure on the school facilities to twenty three per cent in 2001.
The pie charts depict fluctuation in most spending of a UK school for the given years; nevertheless, spending on insurance rose gradually from just two per cent in 1981 to eight per cent in 2001, in contrast, other stuff salaries were reduced from twenty eight per cent in 1981 to fifteen per cent in 2001.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 530, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...slumping to only nine per cent in 2001. Similarly the school's expenditure on school...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 892, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: twenty-three
...expenditure on the school facilities to twenty three per cent in 2001. The pie charts dep...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 923, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ities to twenty three per cent in 2001. The pie charts depict fluctuation in mos...
^^^
Line 4, column 249, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: twenty-eight
... other stuff salaries were reduced from twenty eight per cent in 1981 to fifteen per cent in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, similarly, so, then, whereas, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1316.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 255.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16078431373 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99196925889 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462745098039 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.9 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.584574984 43.030603864 213% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 164.5 112.824112599 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.875 22.9334400587 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 5.23603664747 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232736341851 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131594871252 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575072339147 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163221839897 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675647982555 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.2329268293 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.24 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 11.4329268293 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.