The given graph depicts data on five different basic types of US power sources between 1980s and 1990s. Overall, oil was the most essential energy source throughout US.
It is very clear that the major source of energy production in the USA was oil, which accounted for 42%, just under a half. Following that coal and natural gas showed a little difference in proportion with 22% and 26% respectively, the total amount of these two energy produced outstripped that of oil. In comparison with other types of energy, hydroelectric and nuclear power were not produced in a large scale. Both of these energy came equal in amount of only 5%.
In the next decade, nuclear power proved its potential when the amount of this power production doubled. Beginning with the same level as that of nuclear, however hydroelectric received no change to stand at only 5%. On the other hand, coal and natural gas experienced some noticeable variations when coal witnessed a significant development in production which was higher 5% in 1990s. Conversely, natural gas volume came with a minimal reduction to 25%. During this time, oil production reduced to 33%, which was almost 10% less than the previous decade but still remained as the largest source of power.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...gy produced outstripped that of oil. In comparison with other types of energy, hydroelectr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 422, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this energy' or 'these energies'?
Suggestion: this energy; these energies
... not produced in a large scale. Both of these energy came equal in amount of only 5%. In ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 377, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...pment in production which was higher 5% in 1990s. Conversely, natural gas volume came wi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, however, if, so, still, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99043062201 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62788779845 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612440191388 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2346195585 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8181818182 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200601870734 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696757353438 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716347137262 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15178277937 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0879128532464 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.