The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the changes which occurred.
The barcharts dedicate the rate of the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and 1990s.
Overall, the graphs showed changes in the 1980s and1990s. The rate of natural gas, oil had downward trend meanwhile the proportion of coal, nuclear power had downward trend.
The proportion of oil in 1980 was much more higher than that in 1990( 42% compared with 33%). The rate of natural gas in 1990s was a bit more lower than that in 1980(25% as against 26%). The rate of hydroelectric in 1989 as high as that in 1990s.
On the other hand, the proportion of nuclear power has the lowest in 1980 with 5%, in 1990s the rate of nuclear power increased to 10%. The proportion of coal in 1980 was a little more smaller than that in 1990.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 100, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'trended'.
Suggestion: trended
...e rate of natural gas, oil had downward trend meanwhile the proportion of coal, nucle...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 167, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'trended'.
Suggestion: trended
...ion of coal, nuclear power had downward trend. The proportion of oil in 1980 was muc...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
... The proportion of oil in 1980 was much more higher than that in 1990 42% compared with 33%...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...han that in 1990 42% compared with 33%. The rate of natural gas in 1990s was a bit ...
^^^
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...pared with 33%. The rate of natural gas in 1990s was a bit more lower than that in 19802...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'lower' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: lower
... rate of natural gas in 1990s was a bit more lower than that in 198025% as against 26%. Th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...er than that in 198025% as against 26%. The rate of hydroelectric in 1989 as high a...
^^^
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...f hydroelectric in 1989 as high as that in 1990s. On the other hand, the proportion of...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 84, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...r power has the lowest in 1980 with 5%, in 1990s the rate of nuclear power increased to ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 181, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'smaller' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: smaller
...proportion of coal in 1980 was a little more smaller than that in 1990.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 595.0 965.302439024 62% => OK
No of words: 137.0 196.424390244 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.34306569343 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.42121322205 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2486491111 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 67.0 106.607317073 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489051094891 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 157.5 283.868780488 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.903564002 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.375 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137225107123 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865634538043 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117584332601 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120263096449 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118337868346 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.6 13.2329268293 57% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 96.52 61.2550243902 158% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.0 10.3012195122 39% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.6 11.4140731707 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.78 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 20.0 40.7170731707 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.