the two map below show an island, before and after the construction of tourist facilities. summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The two maps in combination illustrate the changes in island after it has been developed into tourism spot.
Overall, before development, we can see only some trees in island, but, after the development we can see lot of cottage, restaurant and roads in island.
To begin with, before the plan of tourism spot in island, you can only see piece of land with some tress , however, after the succession of the plan, reception was made in the center, which can be easy for customers to get information of all facilities. Similarly, vehicle route is easily accessible to reception and towards the pier, from where people can take facilities of sailing. In the both side of reception, you can many cottage for the accommodation as per the requirement of guests with the small foot track. Furthermore, you can enjoy varieties of cuisine in restaurant, which lies beside the information center. Moreover, beach is converted in beautiful swimming pool, where people can enjoy and prevent the heat as well. Despite, the huge development, tress of island was untouched, which help to save environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-19 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
| 2020-10-08 | asmita acharya | 89 | view |
| 2020-10-08 | asmita acharya | 89 | view |
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to wor for company or organisation Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 84
- Write about the following topic Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from yo 61
- The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999 and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999 83
- Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include examples fr 73
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n only see piece of land with some tress , however, after the succession of the pl...
^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun cottage seems to be countable; consider using: 'many cottages'.
Suggestion: many cottages
... In the both side of reception, you can many cottage for the accommodation as per the requir...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 828, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ouched, which help to save environment.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, well, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04419889503 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81767434833 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618784530387 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.993326359 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.125 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.375 5.23603664747 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131345201016 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589076185492 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424355231431 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106775666139 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028284157359 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.