The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
The map shows how an island changed into a tourist destination.
In general, the island is around 250 meters was transformed significantly by building travelling facilities and transporting systems.
According to the map, in the bottom of the map, there was a pier had been constructed in order to become a bridge to bring visitors to the island by boats. In addition, when visitors come to the island through pier they will go straight to the reception section by vehicle track in the middle of the island, in the North and the West side are accommodation for travelers surrounded by footpath. The coconut trees were kept and along the footpath is the swimming beach at coast of the island.
Back to the North, a restaurant was built above the reception to serve the visitors on the island. To the East, the accommodation was the same as the West. Furthermore, the rest of the island was to the East remain stable.
- the maps below show an art gallery in Australia in 1950 and now 86
- table 11
- Some people think language class should be taught in small class others think the number of students doesn t matter Do you agree or disagree 73
- the bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 66
- More people than ever before are travelling to other countries now Why Is this a positive development or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e island was to the East remain stable.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, as to, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 761.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75625 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79865341504 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58125 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.294060556 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.125 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218065935873 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978103092934 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0945443597318 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150625161231 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102786085905 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.