The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
The diagram below depicts the transformation of an inhabitant island to a highly developed resort with convenient recreational facilities.
As it could be noticed from the mad, before the changes the island lacked the infrastructure and mostly was covered by the palm trees. The only facility on hand was the beach in the north, unsuitable for swimming.
As a result of transformational changes there erected main housing options in the midst of the island, constructed to meet the demand for accommodation. In addition, 6 convenient one-family houses circling the palm trees from the north of the beach were situated in order to extend the housing options. Moreover, planners built the Reception building to provide check-ins and check-outs to the visitors in the area between two accommodation options from the north of the restaurant, that had been previously empty.
Further developments are not less significant. Firstly, the pier connected to the main reception building by the vehicle track appeared in the south of the island providing guests with the sea transition from the insular resort and back via boats. Secondly, poorly developed in past beach turned into a convenient swimming facility with a walking path to guest houses. Last but not least was the construction of the restaurant overlooking the north seashore adjacent to the Reception.
Overall, under the aforementioned developments, the previously wild and inhabitant island turned into a advanced recreational area better serving the visitors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... wild and inhabitant island turned into a advanced recreational area better servi...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45338983051 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11715548022 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588983050847 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.567858761 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139438809085 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488567727271 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368463654811 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0770159078341 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331205082727 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 40.7170731707 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.