The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The two given maps demonstrate an island’s changes that brought out by the development for tourism purposes.
Overall, from a desert island, after the construction, it became a crowded place with many new accommodations and facilities serving tourists.
This island was originally undeveloped entirely. There was almost nothing except for some coconut trees on two sides of the island. However, it underwent significant changes. In the central part, people buit two separate accommodations consisting of simple huts which were arranged around two circular footpaths. Between them, a reception area and a restaurant were located. Another pathway was also constructed, leading to the beach on the western edge of the island. There was a special area here where tourists can swim if they want.
Of paticular note is that access to the island was made possible by constructing a pier for tourists to land safely by boats or ships. A vehicle track then connected the pier with the reception area and cover a short distance path to the restaurant.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The two given maps demonstrate an island...
^^^^
Line 4, column 146, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'tracks'.
Suggestion: tracks
...and safely by boats or ships. A vehicle track then connected the pier with the recept...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 251, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... short distance path to the restaurant.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26785714286 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90168040102 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.696428571429 0.547539520022 127% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6286080556 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.4545454545 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2727272727 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54545454545 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153968159508 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516010650326 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397693700034 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0895770395687 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245054087689 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.69 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.