The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
The two pictures compare and contrast an island before as well as after the construction of some places. It depicts the changes occurred in the particular time period.
According to illustration, prior to construction, there was only a few flora along with a beach on an island. Afterward, a plenty of brand new places were made including restaurant, reception, pier of boating, accommodation and beach for swimming. It is interesting to note that not even a single natural resource exploited by the construction.
In addition, footpath and vehicle tracks were also created by the workers. The construction of former was specifically meant for walking from accommodation to accommodation and beach while latter was specifically constructed for traveling to the boating. Moreover, Vehicle tracks unified the restaurants, reception along with the pier.
To sum up, these places were mainly made to entertain the visitors. Also, wonderful care was given to vegetation to enhance the beauty of place and to made it more peaceful and pleasant.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun brand seems to be countable; consider using: 'plenty of brands'.
Suggestion: plenty of brands
...with a beach on an island. Afterward, a plenty of brand new places were made including restaura...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, well, while, in addition, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39024390244 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14052212833 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646341463415 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.041739086 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142544606886 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560220971473 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123166026525 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10230246364 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125878848133 0.0819641961636 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.