The maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons were relevant.

Essay topics:

The maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons were relevant.

The two maps illustrate how an island looked before and after the tourist facilities were developed there.

Overall, the addition of new building and huts have completely changed the facade of the land. The newly built amenities include living areas, an eating place and various leisure activities.

Initially, the island was a ghostly uninhabited place, with some signs of vegetation in the east and west. It was wholly surrounded by sea on all sides and a small beach could be found on the western tip.

After the mega construction, a large peer was added to the southern coast. This leads to the reception area, while behind it is a restaurant. All of these structures are connected by a vehicle track that runs in circle around the reception building. Moreover, accommodation for visitors are setup to the west and the east of the central reception area, that are accessible via the footpath. Also, the beach has been re-purposed to make it suitable for swimming for tourist's pleasure.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 485, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ble for swimming for tourists pleasure.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, moreover, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 830.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70487294336 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674698795181 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.0633155563 43.030603864 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.0 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136389901776 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462787681978 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759048840919 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0929587806724 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0970899701515 0.0819641961636 118% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.