The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons were relevant.
The pie chart illustrates the causes of an agriculture land losing its efficient productivity. Also, the table further elaborates how these reasons affected land in North America, Europe and Oceania during the decade of 1990s.
Overall, more than half of causes are related, either directly or indirectly, to our food demand and cultivation habits. Vast majority of the degradation was due to overgrazing, over-cultivation and deforestation, whereas a small chunk could also be blamed on other causes. Region-wise, Europe seemed to have taken a huge loss compared to the rest.
Throughout the world, overgrazing cattle accounted for 35 percent of total devastation, which is the highest percentage. Second was deforestation and third was over-cultivation at 30 percent and 28 percent respectively. Lastly, 7 percent of deforestation was due to certain other causes.
Now, if we observe the causes of damage to land's fertility, all the regions seem to have different problems. In North America, a total of 5 percent land has been degraded and most of it due to over-cultivation (3.3 percent). Europe has lost 23 percent of its fertile land, the highest among the three, and the main factor was deforestation (97.7 percent). Similarly, Oceania also lost a significant portion of its land (13 percent) to deforestation, and the main cause there seemed to be overgrazing cattle (11.3 percent).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 44, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'land'.
Suggestion: land
..., if we observe the causes of damage to lands fertility, all the regions seem to have...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, lastly, second, similarly, so, third, whereas, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1168.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30909090909 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24540043245 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604545454545 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0907682103 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3333333333 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149441831339 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598356515957 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643070632258 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104350381358 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101411382146 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.