The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons were relevant.
The two tables depict the sales of coffee and bananas sold under Fairtrade label in the UK, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium and Sweden in the years 1999 and 2004.
Overall, in 1999, the highest sales of coffee were recorded in Switzerland and least in Sweden, whereas 2004 statistics show the UK to be at the top, while Sweden remained the least in sales. Sales of bananas were again the most in Switzerland and least in Belgium in the first year, whereas in the second year, Denmark showed the least sales while Switzerland remained on top.
Coffee sales in 1999 show Switzerland to be the top spender at 3 million euros, while Sweden spent the least, about only 0.8 million euros. However, in 2004, the sales in UK rose sharply from 1.5 to 20 million euros, while least expenditure on coffee was still in Sweden.
Bananas were sold the most in Switzerland, earning 15 million euros, whereas the least sales were seen in Belgium at a mere 0.6 million in 1999. However, sales in 2004 show Switzerland to be the top buyer yet again, at an extraordinary 47 million, while Denmark turned in the least profit, a mere 0.9 million euros worth of bananas were sold there.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'while the least'.
Suggestion: while the least
...e sharply from 1.5 to 20 million euros, while least expenditure on coffee was still in Swed...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, so, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70243902439 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39317888498 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453658536585 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 26.2336440784 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.714285714 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2857142857 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163800513236 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108901388691 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493003229345 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13521416304 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052036604652 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.