The table below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
Given are two tables indicating the sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and banana in five European districts in 1999 and 2004. From the information supplied is apparent that in terms of coffee, the sales had experienced a growth in all countries by 2004. Moreover, while Switzerland was the biggest market of coffee in 1999, UK overtook it five years later. Concerning bananas, Switzerland was the first consumer in both mentioned years.
According to the first table, Switzerland paid the most money for coffee in 1999. This price had doubled by 2004 reaching 6 million of euros. Denmark and UK came to the second and third place with 1.8 and 1.5 respectively in 1999 and UK overtook Switzerland as the biggest market by a rise of 18.5. Meanwhile, Belgium was the least user of bananas in both years.
A detailed look to the second table reveals that when it comes to bananas, Switzerland stood out as the biggest purchaser in both years. While the sales of bananas in other countries is somewhere between 0.6 and 2 in 1990, Switzerland spend a considerable 15 million of Euros for it. The sales had soared to 47 in case of Switzerland, while UK and Belgium had seen a more moderate climb. In stark contrast, sales had declined for Sweden and Denmark.
Overall, sales of coffee and bananas followed different patterns in mentioned areas. While there is an upward trend in the case of coffee. Bananas witness both decline and growth in different countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 236, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Switzerland) must be used with a third-person verb: 'spends'.
Suggestion: spends
... between 0.6 and 2 in 1990, Switzerland spend a considerable 15 million of Euros for ...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 86, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... different patterns in mentioned areas. While there is an upward trend in the case of...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and growth in different countries.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, moreover, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1234.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97580645161 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7688785357 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528225806452 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8778452767 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1428571429 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7142857143 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64285714286 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196972370314 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741805322538 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865258252117 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128393895442 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0840811018235 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.