In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement

Essay topics:

In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying.
To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement?

There is a belief that people are going to use online methods as a free and convenient substitute to printed resources. I would say this is a logical statement which is likely to become a reality. However, books and newspaper will never lose their own specific audiences.

Virtual media has witnessed a considerable growth during these recent decades. Being accessible in the blink of an eye, Internet could provide a wide range of information just by a click. This conveniency can not be ignored in this new high-speed lifestyle. People of modern era have a strong inclination to save time for meeting deadlines, making more money and having more qualified time with their belong ones. As a result, there is no doubt about the popularity of websites and pdf books in comparison to paper-made ones.

Evaluating this matter from another perspective, environmental conservation is also a vital issue which should be addressed. Continuing logging trees would lead to forest demolition and huge ecosystem changes as a detrimental consequence. To stave off the gravity of the problem, industrial activities should take an environmental-friendly approach. If paper production considered as a practical solution, there is a possibility to achieve this goal.

In spite of the mentioned facts, on the other side of the spectrum, there are people who have a high tendency to use conventional newspapers and books. they fulfil different aims by this, from supporting writers and publishing industry to experiencing the joy of holding a book and page it.

In conclusion, I give credit to the statement that people will choose online sources over traditional books. This approach assists them to accelerate the pace of their lives as well as protecting their environment. Nonetheless, books and newspapers would always have their own supporters.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 527, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...books in comparison to paper-made ones. Evaluating this matter from another pers...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
... use conventional newspapers and books. they fulfil different aims by this, from sup...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, nonetheless, so, well, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result, as well as, in spite of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30375426621 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14810481037 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645051194539 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.7111988041 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.4117647059 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2352941176 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05882352941 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167803811092 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479116712677 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392515383868 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0908686930514 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389258438765 0.056905535591 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.