The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons were relevant.
The two tables depict the sales of coffee and bananas sold under Fairtrade label in the UK, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium and Sweden in the years 1999 and 2004.
Overall, Switzerland seems to be the highest spender on coffee in 1999 and on bananas for both years (1999 and 2004). However, coffee sales were solely dominated by the UK in 2004. Furthermore, Sweden came the least in coffee sales both years, while banana sales were lowest in Belgium the first year and Denmark the second year.
Coffee sales in 1999 show Switzerland to be the top spender at 3 million euros, while Sweden spent only 0.8 million euros. However, in 2004, the sales in UK rose sharply from 1.5 to 20 million euros, while least expenditure on coffee was still in Sweden.
Bananas were sold the most in Switzerland, earning 15 million euros, whereas the least sales were seen in Belgium at a mere 0.6 million in 1999. In addition, the Switzerland was yet again the top buyer, spending an extraordinary 47 million in 2004. However, sales in Denmark dropped from previous year, which is a variation from normal trend. A mere 0.9 million euros worth of bananas were sold there in 2004.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 201, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'while the least'.
Suggestion: while the least
...e sharply from 1.5 to 20 million euros, while least expenditure on coffee was still in Swed...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, second, so, still, whereas, while, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83168316832 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37493776328 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490099009901 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7716855077 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206881001793 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107842153852 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582796631218 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157827791266 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566369667702 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.