The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into 3 categories, from 1995 to 2002.
The bar graph illustrates the amount of time spent on telephone calls, in terms of billions of minutes, in three categories, that include locals calls (fixed line), national and international calls (fixed line) and mobile calls (all types), from 1995 to 2002.
Overall, the number of minutes spent on local calls (fixed type) remained constant whereas national and international calls and also mobile calls rose considerably by the end of time period. However, at the end, the locals calls still remained on top, followed by national and international calls while mobile took last place.
Local calls, in 1995, recorded over 70 billion minutes which gradually rose to 90 billion minutes (highest ever) n 1999. After that, we see a downwards trend, reaching the same value as initially recorded in 1995.
On the other hand, both mobile as well as national and international calls saw significant rise in their popularity. In 1995, less than 40 billion minutes were logged for national and international calls as compared to more than 60 billion in 2002. Moreover, only about 3 billion minutes were logged for mobile use initially, that gradually rose to about 10 billion in 1999 and then rocketed to beyond 45 billion in just 3 years, in 2002.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'minutes the highest'.
Suggestion: minutes the highest
...utes which gradually rose to 90 billion minutes highest ever n 1999. After that, we see a downw...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 32, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... 1995. On the other hand, both mobile as well as national and international calls saw si...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, well, whereas, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02912621359 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6179229545 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558252427184 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5523712853 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.5 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.125 5.23603664747 232% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27364598163 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123234350123 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670005781048 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169082384552 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396469242254 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.