In spit of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
We live in a time, where more food is being produced in the world than it has ever been. Improving technology and better understanding of nature has made it possible to cultivate and harvest with much higher productivity. So, why is it that people still go hungry around the world? And what can be done to prevent this? One of the main reasons for this is reliance on imported food and the best way to manage this is to become self-sufficient.
Although the world is producing more food, most of it is produced in a handful of countries. Most of the other countries import food products from such nations, either because they cannot meet their requirements or they do not have suitable environment for its growth. Furthermore, it is not cheap to import food products, so only a wealthy country can do it. So in cases of economic turmoil or decreased production, these dependent nations can face food shortages. Take the example of North Korea. Because it relies on imported food, in cases of tough embargos, it becomes short of food. To put it simply, a country can never be food secure, unless it starts production of its own food.
The management of this problem is not easy but there are various way that can help. Producing your own food, until you become self-sufficient is an important step. This may seem like an easy idea in theory but actually achieving this is a herculean task. It requires good governance, proper management and thinking way ahead in to the future. China is a great example of this, as they utilized their indigenous skills to grow native crops and achieved self-sufficiency. It’s currently one of the most food secure nations on earth. Therefore, self-reliance is the key to managing food insecurity.
In conclusion, importing food from other places is risky and important cause of food shortages, whereas self-reliance is a great way to tackle this difficult situation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, furthermore, if, may, so, still, therefore, whereas, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88923076923 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87852032995 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578461538462 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0789412262 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.45 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197622858042 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749338362932 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0990503531174 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137643246004 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11615160459 0.056905535591 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.