The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons were relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the information about populations of Yemen and Italy, divided into three different age brackets, as it was in 2000 and predictions for 2050.
Overall, in Yemen, the adults and elderly people are predicted to increase in number in the future, while population of children will decrease. On the contrary, in Italy, the adult population is expected to decline, whereas the elderly and children will see rise in their populations.
Adult population (15 to 59 years) comprised 46.3 percent of population of Yemen in 2000, compared to 57.3 percent projected in 2050. In 2000, the highest population group was children (0 to 14 years) which is expected to decline significantly t 37.0 percent in the future. Whereas the elderly (60 or above) are expected to remain the least significant portion, as they were previously.
However, Italy shows opposing trends with adult population declining from 61.6 percent to 42.2 percent percent in the future. A very huge rise can be seen in elderly population from 24.1 percent to almost double (42.3 percent). Lastly, the children population show only a slight decline in the future to a mere 11.5 percent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 96, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: percent
...ion declining from 61.6 percent to 42.2 percent percent in the future. A very huge rise can be ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t to almost double 42.3 percent. Lastly, the children population show only a slig...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, lastly, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0942408377 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75583713323 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575916230366 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.161343746 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.111111111 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173421305139 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793321939635 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079242293602 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126742970337 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0909907388886 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.