in spite of advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
why is this the case?
what can be done about this problem?
It Is true that nowadays, there are many improvements in agriculture sector. However, world hunger percentage is still higher in some parts of the world. This essay will discuss the probable cause for this and also the solution to overcome this issue.
In most developed countries, science and technology play key role to improve their agriculture sector while developing their infrastructure to suit the needs. Genetically engineered seeds and fertilizers are commonly used in those countries. However, most developing countries cannot adopt these improvements because of the lack of knowledge and underlined infrastructure is not developed yet. As an example, countries like USA and CANADA use green houses to grow their crops while developing countries like Sri Lanka depends on natural weather. Although the governments try to educate the farmers about new techniques, the practical approach fail due to the compatibility of their infrastructure.
As a solution, governments in developing countries have to enhance their infrastructure while educating their farmers about modern day agriculture methods will make huge improvement on fighting hunger. Moreover, investing more funds on science and technology to improve the agriculture sector will be beneficial as it can help to adopt new methods and solutions from developed countries.
In conclusion, I believe, reducing the world hunger index, governments are the backbone to support. Although educating farmers about the modern agricultural methods to improve crops, without a supporting infrastructure it will be a one hand clap. So that the supporting government is a must, when it’s come to fighting hunger.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 19, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...apos;s come to fighting hunger.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, moreover, so, still, while, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74603174603 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15281211585 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7384076668 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.384615385 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3846153846 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0970666411174 0.244688304435 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398661863656 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493494405307 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0793836048616 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.079327855112 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.