The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction among many people in society.
Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
It is true that nowadays more and more social media platforms emerged with the intention of getting social networking easier than before, while most people believe this is replacing face-to-face interaction in the society. This essay will discuss why the disadvantage of social media is outweigh the advantages.
In one hand, the core concept of social media is connecting people around the world instantly and share information between them using various technologies like chat messages and video calls. Moreover, It is in-fact save the time and energy of peoples busy life style and they can use that time for some other activities. Because of the development of such platforms people can communicate anyone any time regardless of the place that person lives. As an example, you can make a video call to your friend in a different country without spending money on traveling. Furthermore, larger companies benefit from this technology, so that employee no longer need to be in the premises, meanwhile they can work from their home.
On the other hand, despite of all the benefits from these social media platforms, most of them nowadays believe they are harming the social bonding that we had before with face-to-face conversations. In-fact the main difference between a video call and a face-to-face discussion is the lack of real feelings for each other. Secondly, working from home while avoiding human interactions indirectly make the person fear of real human interactions.
As an example, most of the programmers chose to work from home, by doing that they avoid human interactions and eventually gets more nervous among people. Finally, the lack of privacy is more dangerous than all other benefits. Researches shows that more and more developments of the social media platforms harm the persons privacy than ever before.
In conclusion, although the core fundamentals of the social media is to connecting people all around the world instantly and effortlessly, the harms that comes indirectly is more critical and in-fact this could damage the society and human interactions in future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'outweighed'.
Suggestion: outweighed
...why the disadvantage of social media is outweigh the advantages. In one hand, the cor...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...se that time for some other activities. Because of the development of such platforms pe...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 316, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... of the social media platforms harm the persons privacy than ever before. In conclu...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 254, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...mage the society and human interactions in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ciety and human interactions in future.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27380952381 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80455068329 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532738095238 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2552635426 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.571428571 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285038129367 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907142988962 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734152876793 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160431455069 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823938156827 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.