The Advances in technology have brought a new era of Social Media Networks. Althought, this new way of communnications was thoughted as a tool to become stronger relations, some people have realized that is replacing face-to-face interaction. In my opinion, in spite of the great advantages of this new era as the chance to contact anyone anywhere and to record any interaction, the physical-based method is irreplaceable due to the non-verbal communication and the lower quantity of misunderstandings.
Starting with the advantages of Social Media, it is interesting to analyze how this new era, in difference to face-to-face interaction, created the idea of a global communicated world with a huge range of recorded data. As I mentioned in the previous paragraph, social media networks as Twitter, Facebook or Instagram allowed us the possibility to not just only contact someone in the other side of the world but also save and share any interaction with that person. Let take as an example, the differences between a relation that a traveller has with your relatives today than ten years ago, nowadays it is possible to share messages, photos and videos, while in the past, this would be impossible.
About the disadvages of loosing face-to-face interaction, these new technologies brings a lot of errors in communications and misunderstandings. On the one hand, some things such as sarcasm or humor are difficult to reflect for virutal interactions. On the other hand, as all we know, the non-verbal communication is a really important, a message could be totally different to another just for a little gesture. As a proof of this, in the beginning of the first chats on the internet, it was neccesary to develope the Emojis, as a way to replace this kind of non-verbal expressions.
To conclude, and for all the aformentioned arguments, these both comunnication methods have their own adavantages, for this reason, I am inclined to believe that the best choice is to use them as complementaries.
- People are having more and more sugar based drinks What are the reasons What are the solutions to make people drink less 67
- The Pie chart gives information about the country of birth of people living in Australia and the table shows where people born in these countries live 67
- Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land What solution is better 59
- The chart below gives the information about global population percentages and distribution of wealth by region Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, really, so, while, kind of, such as, in my opinion, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1620795107 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39671250295 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571865443425 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.0796364096 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.454545455 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7272727273 20.7667163134 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16929028217 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065363222531 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660625598043 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930149600563 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489152324644 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.24 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.