Some high school required all student to wear school uniform other higher school permit student to decide what to wear to school.
which of these two school policies you think is better?
Wearing a uniform make a person highlight and advertise the organization he is working.
In most of the developing countries nowadays students require school uniforms when you attending, while some schools allow students to choose casual wear. This essay will discuss why I believe wearing casual cloths is the better option for the students.
On one hand, wearing a uniform teach students about the organizational discipline and follow instructions. In addition, wearing a uniform makes identification easy so the public can clearly see and recognize which school a particular student belongs. As an example, while student wearing a school uniform, it restricts them to do wrong things in public because wearing the uniform means that he/she represent their school.
On the other hand, allowing students to decide what they are wearing helps them to feel comfortable. Although wearing uniforms avoid students wear inappropriate clothes, choosing what they like and comfortable to them is more important so that they can reduce the money they spend on making uniforms. As an example, if a student is in a tight financial state and unable to allocate money for uniforms, this policy will allow them to wear what they have. Because of that student can focus on studies easily. More importantly, most of the developed countries following this policy because of the benefits it gives on behalf of the students.
In conclusion, while wearing a uniform makes a person obey the low of that school and represent the school in public places, I believe, allowing them to choose the cloths for themselves is giving more comfort and helps them to study freely.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'represents'.
Suggestion: represents
...e wearing the uniform means that he/she represent their school. On the other hand, al...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 455, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...will allow them to wear what they have. Because of that student can focus on studies ea...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2052238806 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72487969818 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514925373134 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8003653489 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.25 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413074377047 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165145458289 0.084324248473 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120741655026 0.0667982634062 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24053123749 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117809328381 0.056905535591 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.