The charls below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporling the main features and make co mpariso ns where relevant

Essay topics:

The charls below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporling the main features, and make co mpariso ns where relevant.

The pie charts below illustrate three types of nutreans devided in to average percentages that have in each meal in USA, which harms your health if taken too much.

Overall, according to the charts, people use to have sodium and saturated fats rich dinner in USA while half of the nutrian percentage in lunch and one third of them in Breakfast.

Mostly the highest consumption in Sodium and fats are 43% and 37%, which is in dinner, although the most of the added sugars are in snaks which is 42 percent. Meanwhile, the breakfast seems balanced of all three nutreans and it is mostly similar to each other in percentage. Furthermore, the lowest percentage of sodium reported in snaks, comparing to the dinner that is 14%. in summary, it’s clear that according to the charts, breakfast is the healthiest meal in the day consuming less percentage of all three nutriens, but dinner and snaks are the unhealthiest.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...verall, according to the charts, people use to have sodium and saturated fats rich ...
^^^
Line 5, column 377, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...s, comparing to the dinner that is 14%. in summary, it’s clear that according to t...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nner and snaks are the unhealthiest.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, third, while, in summary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 768.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89171974522 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63595784557 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56050955414 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6466775577 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158042602919 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786826396157 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684765128731 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114662523108 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825194463412 0.0819641961636 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.